By Frank Sances1, Eric Flora1, Shrikant Patil2, Amy Spence1, Vishal Shinde1

1. Pacific Ag Research 2. Trivedi Foundation

Published on


This study tested the Null Hypothesis for the effect of BioField Energy applied to two separate crops under typical growing conditions, namely ginseng and organic blueberry in commercial plantings in Wisconsin and California, respectively. Following treatment to replicated plots in standard experimental design, data were collected at harvest for yield quantity and quality. Ginseng plants treated both pre-harvest and a combination of pre- and post-harvest showed market grade increases of 33.3% and 40.0%, respectively. Point of sale gross return for this crop is dependent upon tuber quality, and from these data the economics of these treatments were calculated. Based on stand adjusted yields and quality values, a combination of pre- and post-harvest treatment increased gross income by 57.4%. The second crop showed similar trends in positive responses. In the two blueberry varieties studied, Emerald treated plants showed 96% statistical increase in yield, while Jewel showed 31% increase. At the time of treatment, each variety was in a different stage of flowering. The Emerald variety was in the flowering stage, and Jewel was predominately in the fruiting stage. Both treated cultivars however demons-trated increased yield quantity and quality. The specific mechanisms that lead to these pre-liminary results need further investigation.


Dabhade, V.V., R.M. R. Tallapragada and M.K. Trivedi. 2009. Effect of external energy on atomic, crystalline and powder characteristics of antimony and bismuth powders. Bulletin of Material Science 32(5):471-479.

NCCAM. 2007. Energy medicine: An overview. Factsheet of the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM). Available online:

Movaffaghi, Z. and M. Farsi. 2009. Biofield therapies: Biophysical basis and bio-logical regulations? Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice 15:35–37.

Park, H., M.G. Lee, J.S. Byen and J.R. Lee. 1987. Relation between crop stand and yield in white ginseng cultivation area. Korean J. Crop Sci. 32(3):369-374.

Patil, S.A., G.B. Nayak, S.S. Barve, R.P. Tembe and R.R. Khan. 2012. Impact of biofield treatment on growth and anatomical characteristics of pogostemoncablin (Benth.). Biotech-nology ISSN 1682-296X/DOI: 10.3923/ biotech.2012

ACS. 2012. Reiki.Factsheet of the American Cancer Society (ACS). Available online: treat-ment/treatmentsandsideeffects/complementaryandalternativemedicine/manualhealingandphysicaltouch/reiki

Rubik, B. 2002. The biofield hypothesis: its biophysical basis and role in medicine. J. Altern. Complem. Med., 8:703-717.

ACS. 2011. Therapeutic Touch. Factsheet of the American Cancer Society. Available online:

Trivedi, M. K. and R. R. Tallapragada. 2008. A transcendental to changing metal powder characteristics. Metal Powder Reports 63(9):22-28.

Trivedi, M. K. and R. R. Tallapragada. 2009. Effect of superconsciousness external energy on atomic, crystalline and powder characteristics of carbon allotrope powders. Materials Research Innovations 13(4): 473-479.

United States Department of Agriculture. 2007. United States standards for grades of cultivated ginseng. Available online:

Yount, G., S. Patil, U. Dave, L. Alves dos Santos, K. Gon, R. Arauz and K. Rachlin. 2012. Evaluation of biofield treatment dose and distance in a model of cancer cell death. J. Altern Complement. Med. 18(0):1–4.

Cite this work

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

  • Sances, F., Flora, E., Patil, S., Spence, A., & Shinde, V. (2013). IMPACT OF BIOFIELD TREATMENT ON GINSENG AND ORGANIC BLUEBERRY YIELD. AGRIVITA, Journal of Agricultural Science, 35(1), 22-29. doi:

  • Frank Sances; Eric Flora; Shrikant Patil; Amy Spence; Vishal Shinde (2019), "IMPACT OF BIOFIELD TREATMENT ON GINSENG AND ORGANIC BLUEBERRY YIELD,"

    BibTex | EndNote